Skip to main content
Premium Trial:

Request an Annual Quote

Worth the Cost?


At Xconomy, Luke Timmerman says it's time to ask questions about whether really expensive cancer drugs are worth the cost. "If a new cancer drug comes out at a price of $100,000 per person, how many patients likely to benefit will actually get it? How many will drain their entire life savings just to make the insurance co-pays?" Timmerman asks. "How many people will go bankrupt to stay alive a few more months? How many people will get overtreated with expensive new meds, when there’s no evidence to support use?"

A group of researchers at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center is taking on this issue and forming an institute dedicated to improving cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment. The new institute, called ICOR, will study the cost-effectiveness of expensive drugs, and the studies it produces will be available both in peer-reviewed journals and in a free public resource.

The center's head, health economist Scott Ramsey, says he's found studies that show that even patients who have health insurance suffer severe financial hardship to pay for cancer medications. "Another study found that Genentech's hit antibody drug, bevacizumab (Avastin), had almost a zero percent chance of being cost-effective for lung cancer patients (actually, it was a 0.2 percent probability)," Timmerman says. He adds, "Drug companies can, and should, be able to recoup the investments they make in the form of high drug prices. But if you're going to charge a high price for a drug, I think a company needs to have a much stronger value proposition than 'Hey, we shrank tumors in half for 20 percent of patients. Now hand over your $100,000.'"

HT: In the Pipeline's Derek Lowe

The Scan

Support for Moderna Booster

An FDA advisory committee supports authorizing a booster for Moderna's SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, CNN reports.

Testing at UK Lab Suspended

SARS-CoV-2 testing at a UK lab has been suspended following a number of false negative results.

J&J CSO to Step Down

The Wall Street Journal reports that Paul Stoffels will be stepping down as chief scientific officer at Johnson & Johnson by the end of the year.

Science Papers Present Proteo-Genomic Map of Human Health, Brain Tumor Target, Tool to Infer CNVs

In Science this week: gene-protein-disease map, epigenomic and transcriptomic approach highlights potential therapeutic target for gliomas, and more