Synonymous SNPs Shouldn't Be Discounted in Disease, Study Finds | GenomeWeb

By Andrea Anderson

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – Synonymous SNPs that don't change the amino acid sequence encoded by a gene appear just as likely to influence human disease as non-synonymous SNPs that do, according to a paper appearing online recently in PLoS ONE by researchers from Stanford University and the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

In PLOS this week: parent-of-origin effects, framework to uncover clinically important mutations from whole genome sequence data, and more.

A survey of Cincinnati schoolchildren finds teenagers want to know their genetic predisposition to disease, LiveScience reports.

More and more universities are helping their researchers patent their inventions, the Los Angeles Times reports.

Cancer Research UK unveils seven 'grand challenges' that it will fund researchers to tackle.