Stanford v. Roche Questions Bayh-Dole Legislation | GenomeWeb

This article has been updated to correct comments attributed to Justice Ginsburg.

By a GenomeWeb staff reporter

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments this week in a case involving PCR patents between Stanford University and Roche Molecular Systems that could have implications for federally funded research institutions and businesses nationwide.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

In Cell this week: proteomic consequences of genomic changes in ovarian cancer, Human SRMAtlas, and more.

At Nature, John Wilbanks and Eric Topol call for openness in health data.

Law.com predicts that genomic and genetic testing will become common in toxic tort cases.

A Pew Research Center report finds that most Americans are wary of using technologies like gene editing to enhance human abilities.