The Great Debate Rages On | GenomeWeb

The Great Debate Rages On

Premium

The battle between whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing has been waged for years. Researchers have discussed whether one approach or the other is better for different purposes — basic versus clinical research, complex versus Mendelian diseases, sequencing thousands of genomes versus just a few. Many researchers consider the debate both useful and practical, to help them clarify the uses of each method, how they could be used together, or how to best develop pipelines to analyze the data coming from them.

Get the full story with
GenomeWeb Premium

Only $95 for the
first 90 days*

A trial upgrade to GenomeWeb Premium gives you full site access, interest-based email alerts, access to archives, and more. Never miss another important industry story.

Try GenomeWeb Premium now.

Already a GenomeWeb Premium member? Login Now.
Or, See if your institution qualifies for premium access.

*Before your trial expires, we’ll put together a custom quote with your long-term premium options.

Not ready for premium?

Register for Free Content
You can still register for access to our free content.

Biomedical research projects are generating a ton of data that still needs to be analyzed, NPR reports.

Theranos is retiring some of its board members, including Henry Kissinger and George Shultz, Business Insider reports.

The heads of 29 scientific societies and some 2,300 researchers call on President-elect Donald Trump to rely on and support science in two separate letters.

In Science this week: genetically modified flu virus could be key to new live vaccines, and more.