Debate Heats Up on ACMG's Incidental Findings Recommendations | GenomeWeb

This story was originally published May 20.

The questions surrounding incidental findings in clinical sequencing — whether to return them, which variants to return, how to return them, and who should be involved in that decision — have been some of the most hotly debated questions as next-gen sequencing is increasingly being used to provide diagnoses or guide treatment decisions.

Get the full story with
GenomeWeb Premium

Only $95 for the
first 90 days*

A trial upgrade to GenomeWeb Premium gives you full site access, interest-based email alerts, access to archives, and more. Never miss another important industry story.

Try GenomeWeb Premium now.

Already a GenomeWeb Premium member? Login Now.
Or, See if your institution qualifies for premium access.

*Before your trial expires, we’ll put together a custom quote with your long-term premium options.

Not ready for premium?

Browse our free articles
You can still register for access to our free content.

In Science this week: new chromatin imaging approach, and more.

University of Wisconsin researchers uncover a mutation linked to Mauriac syndrome, which affects some children with type 1 diabetes.

Theranos has hired executives to oversee compliance and regulatory issues, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Chinese researchers to embark on a trial using a CRISPR/Cas9-based immunotherapy next month, Nature News reports.