Comparison of Desktop Sequencers Clarifies Differences, but No Single Platform Comes out on Top | GenomeWeb

This article has been updated with comments from a researcher at the US Food and Drug Administration.

Desktop sequencers differ in the quality of data and genome assemblies they produce, as well as in their cost, run time, throughput, and other metrics, but no single platform excels in all categories.

Get the full story with
GenomeWeb Premium

Only $95 for the
first 90 days*

A trial upgrade to GenomeWeb Premium gives you full site access, interest-based email alerts, access to archives, and more. Never miss another important industry story.

Try GenomeWeb Premium now.

Already a GenomeWeb Premium member? Login Now.
Or, See if your institution qualifies for premium access.

*Before your trial expires, we’ll put together a custom quote with your long-term premium options.

Not ready for premium?

Register for Free Content
You can still register for access to our free content.

In PNAS this week: chromosome instability in S. cerevisiae, structural differences and sequence divergence in rice, and more.

The San Diego Union-Tribune takes a look at the work to be done in personalized medicine.

An op-ed in the Wall Street Journal calls for the establishment of a patent court staffed by judges and experts with science backgrounds.

Widespread genome sequencing might not be justified just yet, USA Today reports.