Skip to main content
Premium Trial:

Request an Annual Quote

What Gets in the arXiv

The rejection of two papers by the preprint server arXiv has led some researchers to call for it to have greater transparency in its moderation processes, Nature News reports.

The preprint server, which houses mostly physics and mathematics papers, rejected two papers from a pair of students of Nicolas Gisin, a University of Geneva quantum physicist. One paper surprisingly reported that it would be impossible to fall into a black hole, while the other was on black hole radiation. The first paper was later published in Physics Letters A after a few modifications, Nature News notes.

After the first paper was rejected, Gisin asked for an explanation, and he was sent the site's moderation rules, according to Nature News. Those rules state that papers may be rejected if they are not on topic, aren't formatted correctly, need a large amount of review or revision, or if there are copyright concerns, among a few other reasons. But the Gisin says he wasn't told which issue his students ran afoul of. Then when the second, less controversial paper was rejected, he began to suspect his students were blacklisted.

Daniel Gottesman, an arXiv moderator, tells Nature News that moderators can't comment on specific cases. He does add that the site has no blacklist, other than that of users that repeatedly submit rejected papers to game the appeals process.

He also says that that list of reasons for rejection isn't comprehensive.

Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies' Sabine Hossenfelder says the students' first paper was wrong as it makes a "common and understandable mistake." But while she would've rejected it for publication in a journal, she says it would be suitable for the preprint server.

"I hope that this episode will shake up the community and result in more funding for the arXiv, which in turn will help them to provide a better and more transparent moderation," she adds.