More than half of papers rejected by the journal Clinical Otolaryngology were subsequently published elsewhere, according to a new analysis appearing in that same journal.

Researchers from the Mersey ENT Research Collaborative in the UK identified 917 manuscripts that the journal rejected between 2011 and 2013 and searched through PubMed and Google Scholar for corresponding authors' names and key words from the manuscripts' titles to determine their ultimate fate.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Using DNA to sketch crime victims might not be a great idea, the NYTimes says.

Science has its own problem with sexual harassment. What do we do with the research these abusers produce, Wired asks.

Senate Republicans led by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) are trying to change how the government funds basic research, reports ScienceInsider.

In Science this week: combining genomics and ecology to better understand the effects of natural selection on evolution, and more.