Irene Hames, a publishing consultant, says that when journals publish a paper, they should also publish the peer reviews of that paper, according to Retraction Watch.

She argues that the quality of reviews vary so widely that being peer reviewed is no longer a "badge of quality or rigor." By publishing the reviews, Hames tells Retraction Watch that readers would be able to gauge the standards of those reviews.

To read the full story....

Register for Free.

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Lawmakers have asked four direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies to explain their privacy policies and security measures, according to Stat News.

The Trump Administration has proposed a plan to reorganize the federal government, the Washington Post reports.

The Economist writes that an increasing number of scientific journals don't do peer review.

In Science this week: genetic overlap among many psychiatric disorders, and more.