Readers Rate Core Labs | GenomeWeb

Readers Rate Core Labs


People love to complain. Researchers complain about their core labs and core lab workers complain about their users. But how unhappy is everyone, really? Respondents to Genome Technology's fourth core lab survey say they are generally happy with their core labs, consistently awarding them a "good" rating for most metrics. Respondents were particularly pleased with the accuracy of results and the quality of support staff at their cores. Correspondingly, core lab workers said they valued results accuracy and support staff quality in serving their customers.

Get the full story with
GenomeWeb Premium

Only $95 for the
first 90 days*

A trial upgrade to GenomeWeb Premium gives you full site access, interest-based email alerts, access to archives, and more. Never miss another important industry story.

Try GenomeWeb Premium now.

Already a GenomeWeb Premium member? Login Now.
Or, See if your institution qualifies for premium access.

*Before your trial expires, we’ll put together a custom quote with your long-term premium options.

Not ready for premium?

Browse our free articles
You can still register for access to our free content.

In Genome Research this week: vervet genome, tandem repeats affect gene expression in great apes, and more.

Wired's Sarah Zhang writes that the fight over who developed the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing tool first underscores the history of parallel discoveries in science.

Recent research indicates that the benefit of having a number of scientists all living and working in a certain area is eroding.

Tomas Lindahl, Paul Modrich, and Aziz Sancar share this year's Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their studies of DNA repair mechanisms.

Sponsored by
Oracle Health Sciences

Brian Wells of Penn Medicine will detail how his team's "PennOmics" integrated healthcare data warehouse accelerates clinical trial recruitment at the point of care, accepts data from wearables, and does it all in a secure, HIPAA- and research-compliant fashion.