Readers Rate Core Labs

Premium

People love to complain. Researchers complain about their core labs and core lab workers complain about their users. But how unhappy is everyone, really? Respondents to Genome Technology's fourth core lab survey say they are generally happy with their core labs, consistently awarding them a "good" rating for most metrics. Respondents were particularly pleased with the accuracy of results and the quality of support staff at their cores. Correspondingly, core lab workers said they valued results accuracy and support staff quality in serving their customers.

Get the full story with
GenomeWeb Premium

Only $95 for the
first 90 days*

A trial upgrade to GenomeWeb Premium gives you full site access, interest-based email alerts, access to archives, and more. Never miss another important industry story.

Try GenomeWeb Premium now.

Already a GenomeWeb Premium member? Login Now.
Or, See if your institution qualifies for premium access.

*Before your trial expires, we’ll put together a custom quote with your long-term premium options.

Not ready for premium?

Browse our free articles
You can still register for access to our free content.

In PNAS this week: The sea anemone is sequenced, a team describes a CRISPR/Cas9-based approach to label specific sites in the genome, and more. 

In a short video, CNN introduces viewers to a fecal transplant poop donor and explains how the treatments are made.

Researchers are testing the use of transgenically altered diamondback moths as an alternative to pesticides in controlling the bugs.

Two recent papers published in Science and Nature Medicine describe work that may result in a universal vaccine for the flu.