According to CBS News, US National Academy of Sciences had to take down a video and tweet it posted earlier this week on gene editing.
The NAM, NAS, and Royal Society have formed a commission to develop a framework on the proper use of genome editing, and convened its first meeting in Washington, DC, this week.
US National Academy of Science has voted to allow members who violate its code of conduct to be expelled, according to ScienceInsider.
An international commission is to develop a report on how researchers, clinicians, and regulators should evaluate the clinical applications of human germline genome editing.
The commission will develop a framework for scientists, clinicians, and regulatory authorities on the appropriate use of human germline genome editing.
In an initial vote, the US National Academy of Sciences approved an amendment to allow the expulsion of members who violate its code of conduct, according to the Verge.
A commentary appearing in Nature calls for the establishment of a research policy board in the US.
In an editorial, officials from scientific societies in the US and China call for the international community to develop criteria and standards for human germline editing.
Vox wonders whether gene-editing crops will be viewed similarly as genetically modified organisms of if people will give them a try.
A new report urges investigators to routinely consider returning research results to study participants, according to Stat News.
Forensic genetic firm Verogen has bought the genetic genealogy site GEDmatch.
Researchers have 3D-printed plastic bunnies that encase the information needed to make more such bunnies in DNA, according to Discover magazine.
Dan Rather, the former CBS Evening News anchor and executive producer of a new documentary, writes at the Guardian that everyone needs to know about CRISPR.
In PNAS this week: analysis of FOXA1 upregulation in ER-positive breast cancer, gene editing to correct recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, and more.