Survey Explores Provider Attitudes on Who Should Act on Patients' PGx Testing Results | GenomeWeb

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb) – A survey at Vanderbilt University found that healthcare providers ordering pharmacogenomic testing don't need convincing of its usefulness in patient care.

But the study, published this week in The Phamacogenomics Journal, also showed that clinicians who had taken part in Vanderbilt's preemptive PGx testing program could not agree on who should be responsible for acting on the results to personalize care for patients.

Get the full story with
GenomeWeb Premium

Only $95 for the
first 90 days*

A trial upgrade to GenomeWeb Premium gives you full site access, interest-based email alerts, access to archives, and more. Never miss another important industry story.

Try GenomeWeb Premium now.

Already a GenomeWeb Premium member? Login Now.
Or, See if your institution qualifies for premium access.

*Before your trial expires, we’ll put together a custom quote with your long-term premium options.

Not ready for premium?

Register for Free Content
You can still register for access to our free content.

In PNAS this week: carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae, selection against educational attainment-linked variants, and more.

Technology Review points out that a new US presidential science advisor hasn't been selected.

Researchers find that blood tests might be able to help determine severity of a concussion, Wired reports.

President-elect Donald Trump considers other candidates for director of the National Institutes of Health, Nature News reports.