Skip to main content
Premium Trial:

Request an Annual Quote

Caltech Researcher Says Digital Organisms Could Aid Bioinformatics Development


The phrase “in silico biology” is thrown around quite a bit these days, but Chris Adami means it quite literally.

Adami heads up the Digital Life Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology. The team has developed software called Avida — an environment in which populations of self-replicating computer programs can live, evolve, and adapt.

The software was developed with the intent of studying the mechanisms of evolution; thus, it differs from traditional genetic algorithms whose “evolution” is based solely on externally imposed fitness functions, or user-defined “traits.” In Avida, the digital organisms must interact with each other in order to reproduce.

A typical Avida organism is a single “genome,” composed of a sequence of instructions that represents several hundred equivalents of amino acids. A generation spans a second or less, compared to around 15 minutes for E. coli. Thousands of generations can be run in days or weeks, rather than years, and every step of the process is saved on disk.

Adami has a background in theoretical physics, and developed the Avida software to find the “underlying principles” of Darwinian evolution. But it’s not all blue-sky research, according to Adami. There’s an immediate — and very practical — application in bioinformatics: “It’s very useful for testing bioinformatics algorithms,” he said.

Many bioinformaticists use “synthetic data” to evaluate the accuracy of their algorithms, but Adami said that data derived with the Avida software would be more effective at assessing the strengths and weaknesses of new programs, particularly in the areas of phylogenetic tree reconstruction and microarray analysis.

“In digital life, we have strong control over both sequence and function. While we evolve sequences, we’re able to determine what their function is,” Adami said. “The advantage is that you could treat the sequence data that we generate as you would treat any sequence data, and apply the bioinformatics algorithms on them, and then compare it to what we actually know their function is.”

This approach would help bioinformaticists determine whether there are certain circumstances under which aspects of function are missed, or whether there are regions of code that are more vulnerable to mutations than others and how that would affect an algorithm, he said.

Charles Ofria, an assistant professor at Michigan State University and a former grad student under Adami, is currently using the approach to evaluate algorithms for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.

Current methods of evaluating these programs “assess about how well the tree represents the data, but don’t assess how well the tree you get represents the actual tree — the actual relationships between the sequences — because you don’t have the historical data.”

Using Avida, “when we evolve our populations, at the same time we can keep track of the actual [phylogenetic] tree, and therefore if we have a number of sequences that we want to get the ancestral relationships between, we could just use one of these algorithms to reconstruct it and then compare this reconstructive algorithm to the actual tree,” Adami said.

Adami was quick to note that the digital organism approach isn’t applicable to all types of data that bioinformaticists are interested in. For example, he said, because the mutation rate per gene is much smaller in higher organisms, any effect that relies on a very small mutation rate per gene would be difficult to see using digital organisms. Another drawback: “We don’t have transcription and we don’t have a translation stage. So anything that is directly related to splicing is not going to be captured by the digital approach.”

Finally, he said, “until we implement some possibilities of gene regulation and co-regulation into the system, I don’t think we’ll be much help to the people investigating gene networks.”

However, Adami noted, Avida does produce one thing that every bioinformaticist will appreciate: “We create a wealth of data. And in order to get sequence data, we can use the print command, we don’t have to use PCR.”

The Avida software is freely available at:

— BT

Filed under

The Scan

Genome Sequences Reveal Range Mutations in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Researchers in Nature Genetics detect somatic mutation variation across iPSCs generated from blood or skin fibroblast cell sources, along with selection for BCOR gene mutations.

Researchers Reprogram Plant Roots With Synthetic Genetic Circuit Strategy

Root gene expression was altered with the help of genetic circuits built around a series of synthetic transcriptional regulators in the Nicotiana benthamiana plant in a Science paper.

Infectious Disease Tracking Study Compares Genome Sequencing Approaches

Researchers in BMC Genomics see advantages for capture-based Illumina sequencing and amplicon-based sequencing on the Nanopore instrument, depending on the situation or samples available.

LINE-1 Linked to Premature Aging Conditions

Researchers report in Science Translational Medicine that the accumulation of LINE-1 RNA contributes to premature aging conditions and that symptoms can be improved by targeting them.