Bioinformatics Briefs


New PNAS Paper Criticizes Celera’s WGS Approach

Looks like the dust hasn’t quite settled on the disagreement between the Human Genome Project and Celera. In a paper in this week’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Robert Waterston, Eric Lander, and John Sulston analyze whether Celera’s paper on its sequence of the human genome “provides a meaningful test of the whole-genome shotgun approach on a mammalian genome.”

Get the full story with
GenomeWeb Premium

Only $95 for the
first 90 days*

A trial upgrade to GenomeWeb Premium gives you full site access, interest-based email alerts, access to archives, and more. Never miss another important industry story.

Try GenomeWeb Premium now.

Already a GenomeWeb Premium member? Login Now.
Or, See if your institution qualifies for premium access.

*Before your trial expires, we’ll put together a custom quote with your long-term premium options.

Not ready for premium?

Register for Free Content
You can still register for access to our free content.

Researchers report that deleting one gene from butterflies affects their wing coloration patterns, according to the Washington Post.

The Seattle Times writes that pharmacogenomics testing can help choose medications that may work best for people with depression.

In PNAS this week: genome sequencing of weevil symbionts, retinoid X receptor deletion in lung cancer metastasis, and more.

Sequencing could help combat foodborne illnesses, according to a blog post by Food and Drug Administration officials.