Contentious Poster at HCA Show Reveals Subjective Nature of Tech Comparisons | GenomeWeb

SAN FRANCISCO — No one comes out and says it, but at shows such as Cambridge Healthtech Institute’s High-Content Analysis conference held here last week, scientists inevitably just want to hear the bottom line from other scientists: How was your experience with a particular company’s screening platform?

But just how fair these assessments are is up for debate. In many instances, especially in a nascent field such as high-content cellular analysis, direct comparisons might not always tell the whole story.

Get the full story with
GenomeWeb Premium

Only $95 for the
first 90 days*

A trial upgrade to GenomeWeb Premium gives you full site access, interest-based email alerts, access to archives, and more. Never miss another important industry story.

Try GenomeWeb Premium now.

Already a GenomeWeb Premium member? Login Now.
Or, See if your institution qualifies for premium access.

*Before your trial expires, we’ll put together a custom quote with your long-term premium options.

Not ready for premium?

Register for Free Content
You can still register for access to our free content.

In Nature this week: genome-wide transcriptome analysis of brain samples from people with autism spectrum disorder, flounder genome, and more.

Researchers used T-cell transfer therapy to target mutation KRAS, according to the New York Times.

The US Senate has passed the 21st Century Cures Act, which would provide a funding boost at NIH while overhauling FDA policies.

Bloomberg reports that President-elect Donald Trump is considering Jim O'Neill for Food and Drug Administration commissioner.