A recent report in Science found that rejected and revised papers often make their way into higher-impact journals where they become more highly cited, which The Scientist characterized as "an upside to this routine disappointment." Casey Bergman, though, blogs at I Wish You'd

To read the full story....

Register for Free.

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Lawmakers have asked four direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies to explain their privacy policies and security measures, according to Stat News.

The Trump Administration has proposed a plan to reorganize the federal government, the Washington Post reports.

In Science this week: genetic overlap among many psychiatric disorders, and more.

The Economist writes that an increasing number of scientific journals don't do peer review.