Without the Feel-Good Aspect | GenomeWeb

A recent report in Science found that rejected and revised papers often make their way into higher-impact journals where they become more highly cited, which The Scientist characterized as "an upside to this routine disappointment." Casey Bergman, though, blogs at I Wish You'd

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

The White House has created a list of cuts, including to the NIH, that could be in a budget bill for this year.

The US National Institutes of Health is to allow applicants to cite preprints just as they would any other research paper, ScienceInsider reports.

Two manuscript pages handwritten by Charles Darwin are going on the auction block, according to the Los Angeles Times.

In PNAS this week: tool to track transcriptome-wide binding, evidence of balancing selection on behavior-linked genes, and more.