This Week in PLOS

Adam Eyre-Walker from the University of Sussex and Nina Stoletzki examine post-publication peer review in PLOS Biology. Drawing on two datasets — one from the Wellcome Trust and the other from F1000 — of researchers' ratings of published work, they find that researchers appear to be swayed in their assessment by the impact factor of the journal in which the study appears.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

In Science this week: swapping yeast genes with human orthologs to study conservation of function, and more.

Hong Kong is using DNA phenotyping to shame litterers.

A study appearing in Cell suggests some metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients could benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy.

NIH's Francis Collins writes that scientific advances are poised to help populations all over the world, but more scientists are needed to keep the momentum.