Skip to main content
Premium Trial:

Request an Annual Quote

This Week in Nature: Feb 20, 2014

In Nature Biotechnology this week, a team led by researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology report on ways to meet the need for highly accurate sets of benchmark genotypes across a genome. Focusing on methods to make high-confidence, single-nucleotide polymorphism, indel, and homozygous reference genotype calls for the pilot genome for the Genome in a Bottle Consortium, they integrated and arbitrated between 14 datasets from five sequencing technologies, seven read mappers, and three variant callers. They identified regions for which no confident genotype call could be made, then classified them by reasons for uncertainty. The calls are publicly available to help with benchmarking of any method.

Meanwhile, in Nature Methods, a pair of scientists from the University of Chicago presents new algorithms in genome-wide efficient mixed model association software for fitting multivariate linear mixed models — used to test associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms and multiple correlated phenotypes — and computing likelihood ratio tests. The algorithms promise greater computation speed, power, and P-value calibration over current methods.

The Scan

Genetic Ancestry of South America's Indigenous Mapuche Traced

Researchers in Current Biology analyzed genome-wide data from more than five dozen Mapuche individuals to better understand their genetic history.

Study Finds Variants Linked to Diverticular Disease, Presents Polygenic Score

A new study in Cell Genomics reports on more than 150 genetic variants associated with risk of diverticular disease.

Mild, Severe Psoriasis Marked by Different Molecular Features, Spatial Transcriptomic Analysis Finds

A spatial transcriptomics paper in Science Immunology finds differences in cell and signaling pathway activity between mild and severe psoriasis.

ChatGPT Does As Well As Humans Answering Genetics Questions, Study Finds

Researchers in the European Journal of Human Genetics had ChatGPT answer genetics-related questions, finding it was about 68 percent accurate, but sometimes gave different answers to the same question.