Under Review

Reviewing manuscripts for scientific journals is a bit like being a sperm donor, writes David Cameron Duffy at The Scientist, offering up one of the more pungent similes in recent memory.

"They are anonymous and their pleasure, if any, is in the process, not the result," he notes, going on to ask, given this state of affairs, "Who in their right mind would want" such a job?

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

The Blinded Reviewer

Across Generations

STAP Papers Retracted

The Scores' Effect

In PLOS this week: Plasmodium knowlesi population genetics, oral microbiome of infants and children, and more.

The New York Times editorial board weighs in on scientific research misconduct.

The European Commission says it won't take funds from the European Research Council's budget for its new European Fund for Strategic Investment.

The case of the 'devious defecator' examines the protections of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.