Skip to main content
Premium Trial:

Request an Annual Quote

Too Many Democrats Spoil the Science?

A recent Slate article says that there are too many Democrats in science. Democrats found themselves in a unique position during the Bush administration and were able to "score political points" by accusing Bush of being "anti-science," says Slate's Daniel Sarewitz. Now they're convinced that anyone who disagrees with them on issues like climate change is "fundamentally irrational," he adds. Meanwhile, Republicans say that mainstream science has become corrupted by political ideology and gravitates towards fringe scientists, Sarewitz says.

In the Pipeline's Derek Lowe says Sarewitz's conclusion is "reasonable ... if you're the sort of person who thinks about politics all the time." But not everyone does. Politics is one way people view the world, and an easy way to keep tabs on which side is scoring points, but how much of that goes on in labs? If you're talking about a politically-driven topic like climate change, then Sarewitz may have a point, but, "it's hard to fit disagreements over dark matter or RNA's role in early life forms into a left/right framework, much less intramural spats like the structure of the norbornyl cation, the usefulness of total synthesis, or how much palladium you really need to do a metal-catalyzed coupling," Lowe says.

The Scan

Tens of Millions Saved

The Associated Press writes that vaccines against COVID-19 saved an estimated 20 million lives in their first year.

Supersized Bacterium

NPR reports that researchers have found and characterized a bacterium that is visible to the naked eye.

Also Subvariants

Moderna says its bivalent SARS-CoV-2 vaccine leads to a strong immune response against Omicron subvariants, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Science Papers Present Gene-Edited Mouse Models of Liver Cancer, Hürthle Cell Carcinoma Analysis

In Science this week: a collection of mouse models of primary liver cancer, and more.