Close Menu

Sometimes after seeing an initial interesting result from a project, that trend or its significance peters off in replication studies, leading a New Yorker article from Jonah Lehrer to wonder if there is something wrong with the scientific method. The decline, Lehrer says, is partially explained by publication bias or selective reporting, but the rest of the explanation may be due to randomness or noise. "This suggests that the decline effect is a decline of illusion," Lehrer says.

To read the full story....

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have a GenomeWeb or 360Dx account?
Login Now.

Don't have a GenomeWeb or 360Dx account?
Register for Free.

The Lancet has made changes to its peer-review process in response to its recent retraction of a COVID-19-related paper, Science reports.

The New York Times reports that a series of emails show how Department of Health and Human Services officials sought to silence the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

A new initiative aims to move Australia's genome sequencing labs onto one system, the Sydney Morning Herald reports.

In PLOS this week: recessive mutation tied to early-onset dilated cardiomyopathy, epigenetic analysis of lung adenocarcinoma, and more.