Standard, but Flawed

Though peer review has been around for quite some time, Hadas Shema at the Information Culture blog writes that it only became widespread after World War II and expanded as journals became more specialized and advances like photocopying made it easier to share manuscripts.

"Today, peer review is the 'golden standard' in evaluation of everything from scholarly publication to grants to tenure decision," she says.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Using DNA to sketch crime victims might not be a great idea, the NYTimes says.

Science has its own problem with sexual harassment. What do we do with the research these abusers produce, Wired asks.

Senate Republicans led by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) are trying to change how the government funds basic research, reports ScienceInsider.

In Science this week: combining genomics and ecology to better understand the effects of natural selection on evolution, and more.