Skip to main content

A Stand Against Sequestration

The scientific community is taking action to prevent drastic funding cuts that will be triggered on Jan. 2, 2013, if the US Congress can't agree on a plan to trim $1.2 trillion from the federal budget.

Sequestration would shave $2.4 billion from the National Institutes of Health's 2013 budget and $456 million from the National Science Foundation, according to an analysis from the American Association for the Advancement of Science conducted earlier this year.

Last week, the American Association for the Advancement of Science sent a letter to the White House and Congress asking officials to "achieve a bipartisan compromise that avoids the fiscal cliff and moves the country on to sound fiscal footing without sacrificing our nation's crucial investments in science and technology."

Noting that federal funding for science is "not driving our national deficits," AAAS points out that such investments "account for less than one-fifth of the current discretionary budget, but discretionary spending is the only place where deep cuts will be made" under sequestration.

AAAS urges congressional leaders to agree to "a balanced approach to deficit reduction that does not simply take an axe to discretionary federal programs without also considering the contributions of tax revenue solutions and entitlement reform in addressing the federal deficit."

Meanwhile, Stand With Science, an advocacy group founded by students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is seeking signatures for its own letter to Congress, which similarly asks officials to "work for a bipartisan approach to deficit reduction that will assure, as part of that solution, sound funding for federally-funded research and training for graduate research talent since both are key to America's economic future."

The commercial scientific community is also taking action. Life Technologies has launched an email campaign asking researchers to "take a stand for science" and write to Congress via an online form on the company's website.

The Scan

Call to Look Again

More than a dozen researchers penned a letter in Science saying a previous investigation into the origin of SARS-CoV-2 did not give theories equal consideration.

Not Always Trusted

In a new poll, slightly more than half of US adults have a great deal or quite a lot of trust in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Hill reports.

Identified Decades Later

A genetic genealogy approach has identified "Christy Crystal Creek," the New York Times reports.

Science Papers Report on Splicing Enhancer, Point of Care Test for Sexual Transmitted Disease

In Science this week: a novel RNA structural element that acts as a splicing enhancer, and more.