The new March 1 deadline for the US lawmakers to come up with an alternative to the prevent deep, across-the-board cuts known as a sequester is beginning to loom large, and ScienceInsider give a rundown of what those $85 billion in cuts could mean for research and researchers.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

Obama's NIH Budget

A Dollop More

Made it Through

Here You Go

In PNAS this week: Akt3 amplification in glioma progression, Tibetan Plateau frog genome, and more.

The US Supreme Court has declined to review a decision involving the use of "inadvertently shed" DNA in a police investigation and subsequent conviction.

A panel at the New York Times discusses anonymity and privacy of users of 23andMe's services when access to its database is offered for research.

National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins appears before a House subcommittee to discuss his agency's budget request.