The new March 1 deadline for the US lawmakers to come up with an alternative to the prevent deep, across-the-board cuts known as a sequester is beginning to loom large, and ScienceInsider give a rundown of what those $85 billion in cuts could mean for research and researchers.
Registering provides access to this and other free content.
Already have an account?Login Now.
In PNAS this week: mutations linked to nasopharyngeal carcinoma, salivary proteins common among oral squamous cell carcinoma patients, and more.
At Wired, a science journalist discusses her decision not to undergo BRCA testing.
The Japan Times says regulations are needed to oversee human genome-editing research.
In PLOS this week: molecular surveillance of S. Typhi, genome-wide association study of attention in children, and more.