Regulation Needed

As they become better developed and more widespread, non-invasive prenatal genetic tests may get caught up in the furor over abortion in the US and, to a lesser extent, in Europe, writes the University of California Hastings College of the Law's Jaime King in Nature. She argues that the US Food and Drug Administration needs to develop a regulatory framework for such tests and help educate the public about the tests and what they can determine.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

In Nature this week: researchers classify pancreatic cancer into four subtypes using sequencing, and more.

Genotyping analysis of measles in Ontario indicates the strain there didn't originate from Disneyland or Europe.

The UK Medical Research Council says the proposed path of a new train line could affect research at the Francis Crick Institute.

In Genome Biology this week: miRNAs linked to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcomes, database of bird genomes, and more.