Primetime Bioethics

Bioethicists delve into some fascinating questions about some of the most difficult choices involved in medicine, wrestling with crucibles about the when to treat and when not to, the limits of human life, human potential, the quality of life, and even what it means to be human.

These intriguing questions are the bioethicist's daily grind. But just because the questions can be intriguing does not mean the lives of bioethicists are all that exciting. Certainly a life spent writing reports, plotting charts, and skimming law journals would not make for good television.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

In PNAS this week: rare variants linked to bleeding disorder, comparison of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing, and more.

George Church tells The Sunday Times that his group has inserted some woolly mammoth genes into elephant cells.

A Scientific Reports editor resigns over a new policy at the journal allowing researchers to pay to fast track the peer review of their manuscripts, and poll.

The National Cancer Institute's Harold Varmus discusses the state of cancer research with the New York Times.