Plus, You Get to Add 'Patent Examiner' to Your CV | GenomeWeb

Andy Oram has a post at O'Reilly Radar about positive results from the Peer-to-Patent project, which he calls "one of the most audacious experiments in Internet activism in our day." Peer-to-Patent uses a wiki-style approach to determine whether patent claims are indeed new, inviting technology experts to look at patent applications and then post any prior art relevant to them. "First, people are signing up: over 2,000 so far. Second, they're submitting prior art: 202 pieces," Oram writes. "Most important: they're enjoying the work and would volunteer again."

 

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

The Wall Street Journal reports that National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins' response to contamination concerns at the agency might have delayed care.

The final revision of the Common Rule doesn't include the proposed change requiring consent for leftover biospecimens.

The first Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology papers show mixed results.

In Nature this week: mobile phone-based targeted DNA sequencing, and more.