Online post-publication peer reviewers offering critiques of others' papers are confronted by a growing range of places to publish their comments, and they now find themselves trying to pick the publication that will make the biggest impact, Richard Van Noorden writes at the Nature News Blog.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

The Guardian discusses whether big science projects are worth the loss of resources available for other scientific pursuits.

An NEJM update from the ClinVar team highlights the difficulties of interpreting genetic variants.

In Nature this week: genomic analysis of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, and more.

The new Riken president outlines some of his plans for the institute.