Online post-publication peer reviewers offering critiques of others' papers are confronted by a growing range of places to publish their comments, and they now find themselves trying to pick the publication that will make the biggest impact, Richard Van Noorden writes at the Nature News Blog.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

A trio of researchers is trying to raise money to sequence and analyze the genome of a cat with a suite of unusual traits.

Two Johns Hopkins researchers discuss the need for evidence-based data analysis.

In PLOS this week: genes under positive selection in Plasmodium falciparum populations, genetic variation in Epstein-Barr viruses, and more.

Cancer clinical trial patients settle with Anil Potti and Duke University.