A new study in PLoS One statistically analyzes the problem of "widely varying reviews from different referees for the same exact paper," says In the Pipeline's Derek Lowe. The study is a meta-analysis of 52 papers and confirms that "yes, inter-reviewer reliability is low," he adds.
To read the full story....
...and receive Daily News bulletins.
Already have a GenomeWeb or 360Dx account?
Login Now.
Don't have a GenomeWeb or 360Dx account?
Register for Free.