Close Menu

Everyone rants about peer review, but what isn't very well known is that the process serves two purposes, says Chris Lee at Ars Technica. It both decides the value of research — something Lee says it does very well — and serves as "a gatekeeper for scientific funding" — which, Lee says, it doesn't do as well. In the first case, the great benefit to peer review is that it examines a researcher's methods well, Lee says.

To read the full story....

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have a GenomeWeb or 360Dx account?
Login Now.

Researchers trace DNA on a clay pipe found at a former slave site to a population that lives in what is now Sierra Leone, the Washington Post reports.

Two researchers report on their genetic analysis of samples from a shawl thought to belong to a victim of Jack the Ripper, ScienceInsider reports.

Japan is to release rules governing some gene-edited food, according to NHK World.

In PLOS this week: computational strategy for improving gene set analysis testing, miRNAs linked to sleep apnea, and more.