'Overstatement' in the Anthrax Case | GenomeWeb

According to a review by a National Academy of Science panel, the US Federal Bureau of Investigation "overstated the strength of genetic analysis" connecting the anthrax used in the 2001 mail attacks to microbiologist Bruce Ivins, The New York Times reports. The Academy says the analysis "did not definitively demonstrate" that the spores came from Ivins's Fort Detrick lab, though it does say it was "consistent with and supports an association" between the samples.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

In Science this week: metagenomic-based technique for determining protein structure, and more.

An academic laments the rise of narcissism in the sciences, the Guardian reports.

Outgoing FDA commissioner Robert Califf writes in an editorial that the agency can help boost innovation.

The Trump transition team has asked NIH Director Francis Collins to remain at his post, though it's unclear for how long that will be.