Publishers and open-access advocates are duking it out in front of a US House of Representatives committee, reports the Chronicle of Higher Education's Jennifer Howard. The fight is over whether research paid for with federal money should be made publically accessible. Advocates say yes, but publishers are urging lawmakers not to make a hasty decision, "for fear of putting US intellectual property — and publishers' livelihoods — at risk," Howard says.

To read the full story....

Register for Free.

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Oxford Nanopore Technologies is looking into dual listings in London and Hong Kong, according to the South China Morning Post.

The New York Times looks into medical research funding in the US and how the grant system might not be funding the best work.

US lawmakers proposed increasing the National Science Foundation budget, including its facilities account, Science reports.

In PNAS this week: effects of gene deletions on bacterial metabolic networks, genetic responses to sea star wasting disease, and more.