Not So 'Pristine' | GenomeWeb

Not So 'Pristine'

A recent meta-analysis in PLoS One from Daniele Fanelli tries to put a number on how many scientists fake data or lie about their work, says In the Pipeline's Derek Lowe. The analysis says about 2 percent of researchers admit to doing shady things with their data. But the study's author also speculates on the reasons behind such malfeasance, suggesting it's perhaps due to financial pressures or lack of self-awareness.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Pacific Biosciences is hosting a competition in which researchers are vying to win free sequencing for an organism with the most interesting genome.

An opinion piece appearing in Newsday likens familial DNA searches to stop-and-frisk policies.

The San people of Africa have drawn up a code of conduct for researchers, according to the Conversation.

In Nature this week: genotypes linked to hip osteoarthritis, and more.