The life sciences field needs better, more flexible, upgradeable, and scientist-friendly big data management tools. John Boyle, soon to be senior director of bioinformatics at Kymab, writes in Nature.

Boyle says that many data management projects focused on the helping life sciences investigators manage and analyze large data sets have failed because these systems are hard to create, harder to use, and have used a one-size-fits-all approach.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

Things to Come

Sewer Sequences

A Pretty CV

Levels of Evidence

In PLOS this week: GWAS links gene to noise-induced hearing loss in mice, population genetics of malaria parasites, and more.

Nautilus' Alexandra Ossola examines how Tay-Sachs disease jump-started the genetic disease testing field.

FASEB says guidelines proposed by the NIH to bolster research reproducibility are premature and don't take the full range of scientific studies into consideration.

Liquid biopsies and DNA tests may be able to tell physicians whether a cancer patient is relapsing, the New York Times reports.