Statistical significance — getting to that p value cutoff of 0.05 — may not be all it is cracked up to be. In the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week, Texas A&M University's Valen Johnson examines how classical statistical testing matches up to Bayesian evidence thresholds.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

P-What?

Round and Round We Go

Source of the Fever

Gathering the Data

In PLOS this week: gene fusion in premature ovarian failure, population patterns in the Franciscana dolphin, and more.

A National Science Foundation-funded project aims to give researchers access to a network many times faster than the Internet.

Bioethicists weigh the idea of charging patients to take part in clinical research, coming down against the approach.

Cornell's Christopher Mason and his colleagues correct their New York City microbiome study to emphasize "the difference between matching fragments of DNA from a species and a pathogen."