It's Fine

Most retracted articles are not the result of misconduct, a recent PLOS One article reports.

Michael Grieneisen and Minghua Zhang from Wenzhou Medical College in China and the University of California Davis examined nearly 4,500 scholarly papers that were retracted between 1928 and 2011. Publishing misconduct was the most common reason for retraction, followed by questionable data or questionable interpretation of data.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

The New York Times' George Johnson muses on cancer's roots in multicellularity.

The San Diego Union Tribune wonders whether Medicare is ready for personalized medicine.

Jun Wang, the chief executive of BGI, has stepped down.

In PNAS this week: human T cell editing with CRISPR, retrotransposons acting as insulators, and more.