Intelligent Design Again?

Jun 15, 2007

Panda's Thumb has posted a long rebuff of the Wired article that we blogged about several days ago; apparently, according to the blog, the article fails to be balanced. For a detailed glimpse into why ID and science don't mix — and why science reportage needs improvement — read the post here.

To read the full story....

Register for Free.

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Breaking News

The Scan

UK Bioethics Group Gives Cautious OK for Genetically Modifying Human Embryos

The UK's Nuffield Council on Bioethics says genetically modifying human embryos could be morally permissible, according to the Guardian.

CRISPR-Induced Damage?

A new Nature Biotechnology paper reports that CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can lead to large deletions or complex rearrangements that could be pathogenic.

'Fax' It Over

The Wall Street Journal likens a prototype developed by Synthetic Genomics to a "biological fax machine."

This Week in PNAS

In PNAS this week: strategy for reactivating Rett syndrome-linked MECP2, small molecules able to suppress Staphylococcus aureus virulence, and more.

Main menu