Sometimes, says Scientific American's Stuart Firestein, the more facts one gathers as a scientist, the fewer questions one is able to answer. In fact, he says, "science to many people seems to be an impenetrable mountain of facts," and as research fields become narrower and more specialized, scientists tend to cope with this information overload by ignoring most of it. "You have to know a lot to be a scientist, but knowing a lot is not what makes a scientist," Firestein says.

To read the full story....

Register for Free.

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have a GenomeWeb or 360Dx account?
Login Now.

The New York Times Magazine writes that proteomics might be better poised than genomics to say when someone is falling ill.

Bloomberg profiles IndieBio, a startup incubator for the life sciences.

In an editorial, Nature calls for the end to the exploitation of foreign postdocs.

In Nucleic Acids Research this week: collection of epigenome-wide association study data, updated BloodSpot database, and more.