Close Menu

The Economist has a story following a PLoS Medicine paper from John Ioannidis and colleagues which argues that scientific publishing may be biased toward high-profile papers that may have less accurate findings. "With so many scientific papers chasing so few pages in the most prestigious journals, the winners could be the ones most likely to oversell themselves," the article says.

To read the full story....

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have a GenomeWeb or 360Dx account?
Login Now.

Bloomberg reports that the DNA-for-cash deal reported in Kentucky might be a more widespread scam.

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital scientists have treated infants with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency using gene therapy in an early phase study.

St. Louis Public Radio reports that some African Americans are turning to DNA ancestry testing to help guide genealogical searches.

In Nature this week: a genomic analysis of the snailfish Pseudoliparis swirei, ancient DNA analysis gives insight into the introduction of farming to England, and more.