Skip to main content

Fudging the Data

Science misconduct claims are on the rise, reports Gigi Douban from NPR News' All Things Considered. David Wright, the director of the US Federal Office of Research Integrity, tells her that his office received more than 400 allegations of misconduct last year.

Douban notes that there are a number of possibilities for this apparent rise in science fakery. Tools like Photoshop make it easier to doctor images, while other forensic tools may make it easier to spot faked data. In addition, there are more and larger collaborative research teams, which may make assigning responsibility more difficult, but it also means that there are more eyes on the data.

"Scientists are not better members of the general public," Michael Kalichman, the director of the Research Ethics Program at the University of California, San Diego, tells Douban. "There are people in science who will be sloppy, who will cut corners and who, worse, will intentionally mislead."

The Scan

Call to Look Again

More than a dozen researchers penned a letter in Science saying a previous investigation into the origin of SARS-CoV-2 did not give theories equal consideration.

Not Always Trusted

In a new poll, slightly more than half of US adults have a great deal or quite a lot of trust in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Hill reports.

Identified Decades Later

A genetic genealogy approach has identified "Christy Crystal Creek," the New York Times reports.

Science Papers Report on Splicing Enhancer, Point of Care Test for Sexual Transmitted Disease

In Science this week: a novel RNA structural element that acts as a splicing enhancer, and more.