The increasingly competitive funding atmosphere "breeds unethical behavior," writes James Hicks, a physiologist at the University of California, Irvine, in an opinion piece at The Scientist.

Hicks charts funding success rates at the US National Institutes of Health versus the number of retracted papers and says that "we have reached such a threshold: when only around 20 percent of grants are funded, the numbers of retractions skyrockets."

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

It's a Good Thing

All in the Rate

The Cost Burden

Shaming Fraud

Ancient DNA indicates Stone Age, hunter-gather inhabitants of Britain imported wheat.

Joel Achenbach explores at National Geographic why people find science difficult to believe.

In Science this week: gene linked to expansion of the human neocortex, and more.

The National Institute of General Medical Sciences director says changes the agency made have allow it to boost success rates.