The increasingly competitive funding atmosphere "breeds unethical behavior," writes James Hicks, a physiologist at the University of California, Irvine, in an opinion piece at The Scientist.

Hicks charts funding success rates at the US National Institutes of Health versus the number of retracted papers and says that "we have reached such a threshold: when only around 20 percent of grants are funded, the numbers of retractions skyrockets."

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

It's a Good Thing

Papers Pulled

The Cost Burden

And Another

In PLOS this week: genes under positive selection in Plasmodium falciparum populations, genetic variation in Epstein-Barr viruses, and more.

Cancer clinical trial patients settle with Anil Potti and Duke University.

A trio of researchers is trying to raise money to sequence and analyze the genome of a cat with a suite of unusual traits.

Two Johns Hopkins researchers discuss the need for evidence-based data analysis.