Different Way

The point of personalized medicine, as the mantra goes, is to bring the right treatment to the right patient at the right time. But getting such tailored therapies approved may mean that how clinical trials assessing their efficacy and safety are conducted needs to be re-thought, writes Susan Young at Technology Review.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

The Pair of Them

This Week in PLOS

New Treatments to Try

This Week in Science

This Week in Nucleic Acids Research: Researchers describe a new method to find large-scale structural variants in cancer genomes, a glimpse at an approach for profiling miRNAs in tumor samples from TCGA, and more.

Intellia Therapeutics has raised $70 million, becoming the latest firm leveraging the gene editing technology to haul in a gob of cash.

Now going beyond reporting fetal aneuploidies, NIPTs may be providing too much information that may be useless, some doctors and genetic counselor say.

A group of organizations in the UK say that there needs to be discussions about the use of technologies such as CRISPR/Cas-9 for human germline editing.