The combination of scientists' drive to publish in prestige journals and those journals' desire to publish eye-catching work is exacerbating the number of studies whose results turn out to be irreproducible, writes Michael Hiltzik in a column at the Los Angeles Times.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

Related Posts

Still Around

Do It Again

Reproducibility Focus

For Data Cleanliness

Ancient DNA indicates Stone Age, hunter-gather inhabitants of Britain imported wheat.

Joel Achenbach explores at National Geographic why people find science difficult to believe.

In Science this week: gene linked to expansion of the human neocortex, and more.

The National Institute of General Medical Sciences director says changes the agency made have allow it to boost success rates.