The $1,000 genome won't do any good for science if researchers can't interpret it, says Adina Mangubat, CEO of Spiral Genetics, in Xconomy. While industry has focused most of its time and energy to creating better ways to sequence a genome, it has "largely ignored the computational power required to extract and analyze the genomic data in a timeframe that keeps it relevant," Mangubat adds. And most labs aren't prepared for all that data.

To read the full story....

Register for Free.

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have a GenomeWeb or 360Dx account?
Login Now.

An artificial intelligence-based analysis suggests a third group of ancient hominins likely interbred with human ancestors, according to Popular Mechanics.

In Science this week: reduction in bee phylogenetic diversity, and more.

The New York Times Magazine looks into paleogenomics and how it is revising what's know about human history, but also possibly ignoring lessons learned by archaeologists.

The Economist reports on Synthorx's efforts to use expanded DNA bases they generated to develop a new cancer drug.