Michael Eisen has a post at his It Is Not Junk blog taking on a paper from James Evans that suggests that free access to literature has little effect on citations. "This paper ... has many flaws," Eisen writes, proceeding with his list of "the most egregious." For one thing, Eisen says, citation rates aren't the best measure of the value of free access -- and for another, he notes, the raw data haven't been made available for other scientists to perform their own analyses.

To read the full story....

Register for Free.

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have a GenomeWeb or 360Dx account?
Login Now.

An artificial intelligence-based analysis suggests a third group of ancient hominins likely interbred with human ancestors, according to Popular Mechanics.

In Science this week: reduction in bee phylogenetic diversity, and more.

The New York Times Magazine looks into paleogenomics and how it is revising what's know about human history, but also possibly ignoring lessons learned by archaeologists.

The Economist reports on Synthorx's efforts to use expanded DNA bases they generated to develop a new cancer drug.