Resubmission Review

In its May edition of Peer Review Notes, the US National Institutes of Health's Center for Scientific Review reiterates how it defines a new application, in the context of an unsuccessful A1 resubmission. "A new application is expected to be substantially different in content and scope, with more significant differences than are normally encountered in a resubmitted application," CSR notes.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

In PLOS this week: gene fusion in premature ovarian failure, population patterns in the Franciscana dolphin, and more.

A National Science Foundation-funded project aims to give researchers access to a network many times faster than the Internet.

Bioethicists weigh the idea of charging patients to take part in clinical research, coming down against the approach.

Cornell's Christopher Mason and his colleagues correct their New York City microbiome study to emphasize "the difference between matching fragments of DNA from a species and a pathogen."