Replication Over Citation | GenomeWeb

Over at the Scholarly Kitchen, Kent Anderson asks whether the scientific community is measuring the wrong things when assessing a researcher's productivity. While scientists are often judged by their "number of publications, number of citations, [and] impact factors of publication outlets," Anderson argues that "perhaps we should measure how many results have been replicated."

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

In Science this week: global genetic diversity map, and more.

The Nuffield Council on Bioethics identifies ethical questions to explore surrounding genome editing.

In a blog post, Brigham and Women's Hospital's Robert Green discusses "predispositional personal genome sequencing."

Stat News reports that there's muted opposition to the Kuwaiti DNA database law.