About That Finding… | GenomeWeb

About That Finding…

Medical studies that show large effects often don't hold up under further scrutiny, a new paper published in the Journal of the American Medical Association says. Stanford University's John Ioannidis and his colleagues analyzed clinical trial data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and found that "when additional evidence is obtained, most of the very large treatment effects become much smaller and many lose their nominal significance," the authors write.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

The White House has created a list of cuts, including to the NIH, that could be in a budget bill for this year.

The US National Institutes of Health is to allow applicants to cite preprints just as they would any other research paper, ScienceInsider reports.

Two manuscript pages handwritten by Charles Darwin are going on the auction block, according to the Los Angeles Times.

In PNAS this week: tool to track transcriptome-wide binding, evidence of balancing selection on behavior-linked genes, and more.