Synonymous SNPs Shouldn't Be Discounted in Disease, Study Finds | GenomeWeb

By Andrea Anderson

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – Synonymous SNPs that don't change the amino acid sequence encoded by a gene appear just as likely to influence human disease as non-synonymous SNPs that do, according to a paper appearing online recently in PLoS ONE by researchers from Stanford University and the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

In Nucleic Acids Research this week: transcriptome patterns of Zika-infected cells, updated Comparative Toxicogenomics Database, and more.

BMJ study says that about half of former hematology-oncology regulators now work for industry.

Science should wish PhDs who leave academia well, a Nature editorial says.

New York-based doctors announce the birth of a baby boy whose parents underwent mitochondrial transfer therapy, New Scientist reports.