Synonymous SNPs Shouldn't Be Discounted in Disease, Study Finds | GenomeWeb

By Andrea Anderson

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – Synonymous SNPs that don't change the amino acid sequence encoded by a gene appear just as likely to influence human disease as non-synonymous SNPs that do, according to a paper appearing online recently in PLoS ONE by researchers from Stanford University and the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

In PNAS this week: statistical approach to examine intra-tumor heterogeneity, new genetic condition called otulipenia, and more.

Blood tests looking for biomarker changes could catch mental illnesses earlier, Newsweek reports.

DNA testing offers Korean adoptees a way to find their birth parents that sidesteps bureaucratic red tape, according to the New York Times.

A National Institutes of Health researcher has filed an Equal Employment Opportunity complaint against the agency, the Washington Post reports.