Supreme Court Rules for Roche, Clarifies Bayh-Dole | GenomeWeb

This article has been updated with additional comments from the Supreme Court decision and a legal expert.

By Matt Jones

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) –In a ruling that may lead federally-funded research universities to clarify their intellectual property agreements with their employees, the US Supreme Court ruled today that Stanford University does not have a claim to PCR technology-related patents that it said Roche Molecular Systems has infringed.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

In Science this week: global genetic diversity map, and more.

The Nuffield Council on Bioethics identifies ethical questions to explore surrounding genome editing.

In a blog post, Brigham and Women's Hospital's Robert Green discusses "predispositional personal genome sequencing."

Stat News reports that there's muted opposition to the Kuwaiti DNA database law.